Painting a piece of a painting…? I’ve played with this idea in the past (not very successfully)– to isolate a small section of a painting, and reference it to make a large painting. If only I could magnify the immediacy and verve that live in those sexy little sections that were produced through spontaneity and intuitive mark-making, and create BIG paintings echoing those same qualities. Sounds easy. Ha.
So my last post showed the large piece I recently finished— “New Territory”.

“New Territory. 53×65”. mixed media on Fabriano paper. ©2014 Karen Rand Anderson
What I didn’t say about it is that it’s actually referenced from a very small detail from another painting, “Shadow Walk”, 36×36”, mixed media on wood panel. See the loose reference? This detail is about 4×6″. (I left out the dead tree in the 53×65″painting.)
detail, “Shadow Walk”
Here’s the quick journal sketch: 
And here’s the original painting:

Shadow Walk, 36×36″. mixed media on wood panel. ©2014 Karen Rand Anderson
I still like the detail best.
Abstract expressionist Franz Kline was able to maintain that freshness from small sketches to gargantuan canvases. He loved the quality of the mark-making in his small quick brush sketches, and in 1948 when his buddy Willem de Kooning turned him on to the Bell-Opticon opaque projector, he discovered he could project those small energetic strokes as enlarged abstract gestures. He grabbed a big brush, some black house paint, and used the projected images as templates for some very big paintings, which became huge calligraphic statements on the canvas.
Franz Kline in studio, 1954. Fritz Goro photo.
When Kline first projected one of his small ink sketches onto the wall, this is what he described:
“A four by five inch black drawing of a rocking chair…loomed in gigantic black strokes which eradicated any image, the strokes expanding as entities in themselves, unrelated to any entity but that of their own existence.”
Sounds like abstract expressionism in a nutshell.

Franz Kline (American, 1910-1962). Untitled II, ca. 1952. Ink and oil on cut-and-pasted telephone-book pages on paper on board. 11 x 9 in. (28.1 x 23 cm). © 2010 The Franz Kline Estate / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York
Here’s a short, jazzy little video from the MoMA about Kline’s painting process.
Keep in mind that the bigger you go, the more you spend— time, materials, energy. Bigger brushes=expensive; bigger canvas or panel= way expensive; more paint (oil or acrylic) = way, way more expensive. Klein used black enamel house paint because he could get it inexpensively, and loved the workability of it. [Oh well, I’m a coloroholic, I’ll admit it. Also I use water-based materials. No more toxic stuff in my studio] So, big for me is say, 60 or 70″. Big for Kline was, well, REALLY big.
While Kline sometimes used a projector to magnify his images, I take small digital detail pics with my iPhone and then make awkward sketches of them in my art journal before attempting to translate the image into a larger scale. I wonder. Should I find a projector?

detail, from “Vermont Reflections” On it’s way to becoming a big painting…. maybe.

“Vermont Reflections” 24×24″. mixed media on canvas. ©2014 Karen Rand Anderson
Sharing is just awesome, and I would be delighted if you want to share my post...
Like this:
Like Loading...